• For four decades, Roy T. Englert, Jr. has been arguing high-stakes cases that address cutting-edge legal issues. Roy’s 21 arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States — covering such disparate issues of law as antitrust, bankruptcy, the False Claims Act, the Freedom of Information Act, civil RICO, employment discrimination, administrative law, Article III standing, separation of powers, and the death penalty — have resulted in an exceptional record of 18 wins, two losses (one by an equally divided Court) and one split decision. Roy has argued numerous multimillion-dollar and multibillion-dollar appeals, including two appeals resulting in reinstatement of more than $4.5 billion worth of avoidance claims brought by the Madoff trustee; cases resulting in recoveries totaling in the billions of dollars for clients; and cases relieving clients of liability valued in the hundreds of millions. Roy has particularly extensive antitrust appellate experience and has won a complete victory on the antitrust counts in every case he has ever argued in an appellate court, whether for a plaintiff, for a defendant, or for an amicus — most recently in July 2022, when the Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Roy’s client in a monopolization case between two large pharmaceutical companies.

    Roy is consistently ranked as a leading U.S. Supreme Court and appellate litigator. Chambers USA has given Roy top nationwide rankings for more than 15 consecutive years, noting that he is “widely recognized as a ‘fabulous appellate lawyer’ with … [the] ability to ‘dig in and rip up the opposition’ in high-stakes appellate work” and that he “brings a wealth of experience spanning a diverse range of appeals, including significant experience in arguments before the Supreme Court.” Chambers sources describe Roy as “an excellent advocate who is very savvy about how to succeed in a variety of courts” and who “makes incredibly strategic arguments,” as well as “an all-around excellent advocate and brief writer [who] prepares relentlessly and has a strategic feel for the court.” He has won particular praise for his brief writing, with Chambers sources noting “Roy’s briefs are marvelous and magical”; “his ability to make his brief a compelling read which an audience can engage with is excellent”; and “he’s able to simplify complicated issues to make them more easily understandable, and his oral arguments are terrific.” Recent Chambers sources say Roy “is just such an intelligent and experienced lawyer. He’s second to none.” Others tell Chambers that Roy is “a fantastic advocate” and “he’s wonderful. The briefs have been very, very well written.” Roy “is outstanding. His skill set is in taking the trial level dispute and distilling it in a way that captures the essence of our argument.”

    Benchmark Litigation and Legal 500 also give Roy top rankings. Legal 500 describes him and his colleagues as “exceptional appellate lawyers [] who quickly understand the specifics of a business and the application of those specifics to the case. Their arguments are insightful and concise. And most importantly, they win.” Thomson Reuters’ Super Lawyers regularly ranks Roy among the top appellate lawyers in Washington, DC, and in each of the past five years (2018 – 2022) has ranked him among the overall top 100 lawyers in the city, ranking him in the top 10 in four of those years.

    Roy co-founded Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner LLP in 2001, after more than a decade in private practice with a global law firm. He previously served in the Office of the Solicitor General for the U.S. Department of Justice. Roy has also served as an adjunct professor working with the Appellate Litigation Clinic at Georgetown Law for two decades and commits significant time to a number of law-reform and civic-education activities.

    Roy has been involved in the Olympic sport of judo for decades and has served as the president of a well-established nonprofit judo organization. He has also served on the board of directors of an award-winning nonprofit theater company.

    Experience

    • Obtained summary judgment, and defended that judgment on appeal, on behalf of a global pharmaceutical manufacturer on antitrust claims by a competitor seeking billions on allegations related to the client’s rebate agreements with pharmacy benefit managers.

    • Represented filers of an amicus brief in support of employees in landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, forbids discrimination against LGBTQ employees.

    • Represented filers of an amicus brief in support of environmentalists in a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court concluded that the Clean Water Act does not limit regulation to “direct” discharges of pollutants into navigable waters and articulated a new test.

    • Argued and won before the U.S. Supreme Court a constitutional separation-of-powers challenge to a statute giving broad powers to bankruptcy judges to hear and decide claims by debtors against creditors.

    • Argued and won two major appeals on behalf of the trustee responsible for remedying the frauds committed by Bernard Madoff, one with $4 billion at stake and pertaining to application of the Bankruptcy Code and principles of international comity to transactions involving foreign feeder funds, and the other with more than half a billion dollars directly at stake and pertaining to the standards for transferees’ “good faith” defense.

    • Argued and won high-dollar-value appeals in a Third Circuit bankruptcy case and a Second Circuit contract case.

    • Briefed and argued an appeal in which the Third Circuit agreed with the Bankruptcy Court that the client had the right to modify the terms and conditions of employment for its employees from those imposed by an expired collective-bargaining agreement because the modifications were necessary for the casino to remain in business and that without the modifications, all employees would have lost their jobs.

    • Represented creditors of the Republic of Argentina in lengthy litigation involving multiple appeals and multiple petitions for certiorari, ultimately resulting in 10-figure payments to clients.

    • Argued and won a Robinson-Patman Act case in the Third Circuit, building on a U.S. Supreme Court decision argued and won four years earlier.

    • Assisted the state of Alaska in winning a U.S. Supreme Court argument involving a claim of a constitutional right to post-conviction DNA testing, and assisted the Commonwealth of Kentucky by arguing and winning a case involving a constitutional attack on the means used to carry out the death penalty by lethal injection.

    • Argued and won two different U.S. Supreme Court cases involving the efforts of payphone service providers to collect millions of dollars in compensation from long-distance carriers, in which the Court decided issues pertaining to the existence of a private right of action under the Communications Act and to the Article III standing of assignees to pursue the providers’ claims in federal court.

    • Represented filers of amicus briefs in five different U.S. Supreme Court antitrust cases decided in a four-year period, all on the winning side.

    • Represented creditors of Owens Corning and its subsidiaries in multiple related appellate proceedings, winning a writ of mandamus, after presenting two Third Circuit arguments, to compel recusal of a trial judge, and served as co-counsel with a leading bankruptcy practitioner, who argued before the Third Circuit and obtained a reversal of a “substantive consolidation” ruling that had the effect of shifting approximately $1 billion of value among creditors.

    • Argued and won two cases in the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1998 – 1999 term, and two cases in the 2002 – 2003 term, in disparate fields of law — bankruptcy, Americans with Disabilities Act, RICO and milk regulation.

    Credentials

    Education

    • J.D., cum laude, Harvard Law School, 1981
      • Executive Editor, Harvard Law Review
    • A.B., Mathematics, Princeton University, 1978

    Bar Admissions

    • District of Columbia, 1981
    • Virginia (inactive), 1982

    Clerkships

    • Court Law Clerk, primarily working with the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, U.S.C.A., D.C. Circuit, 1981 - 1982

    Professional Affiliations

    • Member (appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts), Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 2010 – 2016
    • Member, and President (2008 – 2009), Edward Coke Appellate Inn of Court
    • Fellow, American Academy of Appellate Lawyers
    • Former member (2002 – 2010), Constitutional & Administrative Law Advisory Committee, National Chamber Litigation Center
    • Member, Outside Advisory Board, and frequent Moot Court Panelist, Georgetown Supreme Court Institute
    • Member, Program Committee, Supreme Court Historical Society
    • Moot Court Panelist, Supreme Court Seminar Faculty Member, and recipient, 2009 Supreme Court Seminar Special Recognition Award, National Association of Attorneys General